The book Bioethics: Principles, Issues and Cases majorly explores the medical, social, philosophical and legal issues that are faced in the medicine field. Such bioethical issues have a proper role in the health care industry. The book opens with an introduction to ethics, moral reasoning then the issue of bioethics. The book further touches on various ethical theories that integrate different tools of bioethics. All ethical choices are taken in whatever circumstance that confronts people on a day to day basis in the industry of health care (Vaughn 602). All the guidelines provided in the book need to go well with people who are religious as well as those that are not religious.
In science and general medicine, it is clear that all the bioethics principles have to be applied in all circumstances, to help people understand their moral duties within certain situations. In chapter 11 of the book Bioethics: Principles, Issues and Cases, there is a broad discussion of the issue of dividing up health care resources. The section explains the problems that are faced in the health care industry. Additionally, theories of justice are discussed, where different ethical issues are rationed to provide a balanced environment for medical practices (Vaughn 606). There are various cases given to provide real life scenarios of situations that are related to problems faced in the health care industry.
In the chapter, there is a discussion as to whether a person has a right to healthcare services. If it so, what does the principle encompass? The chapter explains that people are entitled to different health services as long as they fit the rationale of qualification (Vaughn 623). Additionally, the chapter touches on the right to a decent minimum healthcare. The case is explained that all people have the right to receive the minimal services of treatment without any question. All patients have the right to medical services, social justice and all aspects of fairness in the allocation of services in a health care institution.
I believe that the subjects discussed in the chapter are significant in the field of bioethics. One of the most interesting reads is the issue of rationing of medical services in a fair manner. According to Vaughn, certain health care services must be rationed in a careful and equitable way to ensure that resources are not wasted (633). Additionally, it is interesting to know that there are ways of ensuring that resources are supposed to be provided depending on their urgency and availability. Ideally, the ethical practice of allocation of exotic medical life saving therapy is significantly active. I believe that it is only proper that patients receive treatment that is needed to ensure they are fully cured.
I have been through an experience where I had to choose whether my grandfather was to die or not. Having been brain dead for more than six months, the hospital thought it best to pull off the plug on the life support, considering the fact he was way past 90 years old. I was at cross roads since I did not know if my grandfather wanted to let go or not. The doctors were able to talk to me about the options. They also explained to me why it was important to let him go, especially since there were sicker patients who could use the bed and services that were being provided to my grandfather. I think about the case when going through chapter 11 of the book since it touches mainly on the welfare of the patients.