Sexual Objectification of Females Ought To Be Denounced Powerfully
The (Alder & Worrall, 2004; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). There are people with high regard for absolute modesty and others who are convinced that the body should be taken as natural and rather sacred. When in public places, I witness the equilibrium being smashed by the hormone-driven gazes of males as well as females’ quest for perfection. The breaking of the equilibrium occasions altercations, or conflicts, in which the males feel blamed, and the females feel objectified. In the “Looking at Women”, essay, Sanders (2011) mulls over how the males ought to look at the females. For many centuries, females have been viewed as being objects by males. For many centuries, women have often been represented in artwork in the nude. By and large, men view curvaceous women as rather beautiful. The more a voluptuous and curvy a female is the more stunning males see her (Brooks, 1995; Chan, 2014). Over time, females have complained of the marked risks that objectification presents to them, including the risks of street harassment and dysfunctional families. Sexual objectification of females ought to be denounced powerfully.
Read also Impact of Easy Access to Pornography on Young People’s Sexual Relationships
(Brooks, 1995; Chan, 2014; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). The persons commonly contend that if females are not keen on being objectified, they would at the very earliest opportunities put an end to their objectification (Alder & Worrall, 2004; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). Some women are accused of persistently defining own bodies with the aim of rendering service to others. A close friend of mine recently quipped that women cannot justifiably argue against their sexual objectification since most of them allow for the usage of own bodies literally by others. Does the apportioning of the blame on women for their sexual objectification sanitize it? Does the apportioning of the blame on women for their sexual objectification address the related risks adequately? Blaming women for their objectification by men and the corresponding risks is not well-founded (Chenoweth, 1998; Karsten, 2006; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). I strongly believe that men are to be blamed absolutely for the objectification and the risks since they elementarily initiate unwelcome sexual engagements, and they focus markedly on the appearances of women. No matter how women what women do, they cannot stop men from objectifying them completely (Chenoweth, 1998; Sanders, 2011). The singular way through which the objectification can be stemmed truly is if men cease doing it.
Read also Violence against Women – The wife of Bath’s Tale, The Clerk’s tale, The Rape of Lucrese, Wuthering heights and The Penelopiad
Sexual objectification of females ought to be denounced forcefully since it exposes women to sexual coercion. The males who markedly zero in on the appearance of given females, especially own partners, have a highly chance of having negative feelings, including shame and anger regarding the bodies of the females (Alder & Worrall, 2004; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). Such men have a high chance of subscribing to sexual ideas that are coercive. They are likely to view the females as being duty bound to offer them sex. Such ideas and the related beliefs make males highly likely to become violent and coercive to force their partners to give in to their sexual demands (Brooks, 1995; Chan, 2014; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). That means that the objectification of females, especially those in intimate relationships, is in every way a grave red flag (Chenoweth, 1998; Karsten, 2006; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). If given females are objectified in their relationships, there are always high chances that their partners will be inclined towards sexually pressurizing and coercing them. The males become convinced that it is the role of own partners to offer them sex on demand (Sanders, 2011). The males are considerably likely to seek sex via manipulation or outright violence in some cases (Chenoweth, 1998; Karsten, 2006; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). I am not surprised that males who sexually objectify own partners are as well highly likely to pressurize them inhumanely to offer them sex.
Sexual objectification makes women remain timid and thus should be condemned strongly. That is largely owing to the double standards that are commonly applied when reflecting on the objectification (Brooks, 1995; Chan, 2014; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). Alder & Worrall, 2004). Objectification happens more or less that way. When a curvaceous woman moves in any given direction, there are random groups of men talking about how stunning she looks. The groups keep the woman from acting or being courageous (Chenoweth, 1998; Karsten, 2006; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). The woman may shy off from venturing outside her house for fear of street harassment, being stared at or even being judged. The woman may shy off from getting into particular spaces (Sanders, 2011). Besides, the woman may be kept away from feeling at ease in given spaces (Chenoweth, 1998; Karsten, 2006; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). The women ought to amass marked physical, as well as mental, strength to get to such spaces otherwise; she becomes incapable of expressing position since she can be delegitimized at any time with recourse to own sexuality and body as opposed to her opinions.
There is a continuing need to denounce sexual objectification of females strongly since it makes them suffer body shame. When a man expresses negative or hurting, feelings regarding his partner’s body, the partner has a high chance of internalizing the expressed feelings, or views (Chenoweth, 1998; Karsten, 2006; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). The partner has a minimal chance of asserting herself and communicating openly regarding her sexual desires, especially if the man is coercive. Owing to sexual objectification, many females live in a continuing state of dishonor, or shame, which feels largely normal presently (Alder & Worrall, 2004; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). Appearance anxiety along with body shame affects the majority of females at high rates, forcing them to go into hiding or change any items that are deemed not to be in line with the applicable internal image standards or external image standards. Body shame is a risk factor for other challenges that females who are objectified are likely to suffer, including depression (Sanders, 2011). Besides, body shame is a risk factor for disordered eating, unsafe sexual practices, anxiety, sedentary lifestyle, cosmetic surgery related needs, and diminished mental activity and performance. These challenges certainly affect the females’ quality of life adversely (Brooks, 1995; Chan, 2014; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). Notably, many businesses now promote anxiety and shame, which affects health choices negatively, among females to market own products. From my encounters with many females suffering from body shame in the past I can only conclude that body, shame is a rather discouraging and debilitating force, which harms everyone regarding body image. The females are dissatisfied with their body images irrespective of the ideals they meet. They are unlikely to partake in physical engagements (Kuhn & Radstone, 1994; Sanders, 2011). That is a very actual phenomenon regarding females who steer clear of physical activities since they take themselves as being too heavy, or fat, to take up the activities. The shame occasions their physical inaction considerably. By and large, objectified women persistently characterize their takes own body shame based in how attractive or unattractive they are adjudged by their partners (Chenoweth, 1998; Sanders, 2011). Presently, many industries are perpetuating and exploiting the females’ anxieties through the representation of the females based on just their appearances, development and diagnosis of flaws, and selling of varied products. Many of the products are marketed as capable of fixing the flaws in the females’ bodies to make them feel valued, happy as well as attractive (Brooks, 1995; Chan, 2014; Kuhn & Radstone, 1994). Notably, the products, though marketed as capable of enhancing one’s appearance, almost all of them never reduce body anxiety (Kuhn & Radstone, 1994; Sanders, 2011). That means that the body shame effects that stem from the sexual objectification of females are rather challenging to reverse.
Clearly, out an end to sexual objectification remains a priority for enhancing the wellbeing of women. Sexual objectification of females ought to be denounced powerfully since it exposes women to sexual coercion. There is an ongoing need to condemn sexual objectification of females strongly since it makes them suffer body shame. Sexual objectification makes women remain apprehensive. Activists ought to go on working straightforwardly with males to lessen romantic relationship objectification and general objectification.