The Buy American Requirements Assignment Instructions And Sample Answer

Assignment Instructions

In order to complete this assignment, refer to the scenario from Assignment 1, as well as to the scenarios and readings from previous weeks.

Write 7 pages paper in which you:

  1. Specify the main points of the Buy American Requirements in one (1) page or less.
  2. Determine the substantive means by which the Buy American Requirements would benefit both VectorCal and your new company. Provide a rationale for the response.
  3. Analyze the fundamental ways in which the Buy American Requirements are contradictory to a capitalistic ethos, given that the U.S. government claims to promote competition and the U.S. espouses a free market ideology (i.e., capitalism). Support your answer with two (2) examples of such a contradiction.
  4. Debate whether or not you believe that the exceptions to the Buy American Requirements set forth by the government are fair and advantageous to the U.S. economy. Provide a rationale for the response.
  5. Determine the key advantages and disadvantages of using the Buy American Requirements with the navigation system that both VectorCal and your company produce. Justify the response.
  6. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Determine how to validate costs and certify cost and pricing data.
  • Specify the government policies regarding profit and pricing adjustments for contracts.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in cost and price analysis.
  • Write clearly and concisely about cost and price analysis using proper writing mechanics.

Sample Answer

How The Buy American Act will be of benefit to VectorCal and my new company

Many products that most Americans buy each and every day are manufactured in other countries. The Buy American Act is thus beneficial as it ensures this does not go overboard. American companies before the onset of this Act were facing very stiff competition from other foreign firms. As a result of this, the federal government came to the realization of the essence of the regulation of the economy by passing this act which would protect the American Companies in the United States.

One of the benefits of this is that when American products and services are used, American companies are able to thrive and stay longer in the market. For example, an employer will not be able to build a company when they have nothing to make. If people are not willing to purchase the product, then employers have no reason to produce it. For example, when a tractor is bought from a local supplier, the local market will thrive. This is the same way that works out for VectorCal and the new company. When their navigation products are utilized in the market, this is how they can be able to thrive well but when they are not used, the company is more likely to exit the market.

Most of the American companies as well as the individuals have benefited a great deal from this act. This is because the supply of the local commodities to the US government as well as the contractors is now possible (Luckey, 2009). This has given the local companies a competitive advantage over the foreign ones. Both my new company and VectorCal are now advantageous as they stand at a better chance of winning the government contracts as they are local US Companies.

However, it is advisable not to keep the hopes too high. VectorCal and my new company may fail to get the government tenders as there are many competitors within the American local market. If this happens, then they will have the chance to supply the locally made goods to the local companies that will have won the tender. This is because according to the law, the local companies that will have been given the tenders will have to ensure that their supplies are locally made (Wise, 2009). There is also a provision for these companies to buy the goods and services from other local companies and thus at the end of the day, the Buy American Act will satisfy almost all the local companies in the American market.

According to Luckey, 2009, the argument above is based on the rationale that companies that are operating in the local American market are likely to win more tenders in the US government as compared to the international companies. Aside from this, if these companies may fail to get the tenders, they can as well sell their locally produced products to the companies awarded the tenders.

            Contradictions of Buy American Requirements to the capitalistic ethos.

For a competition to be termed as being fair, they should not be interfered with either by the capitalists markets or by the government. According to Connolly, 2008, all companies should be allowed to compete basically on the basis of their capacities. The Buy American Act on the contrary acts against the rule of capitalism. It protects the American local firms from the foreign firms so as to ease competition. The federal government has thus interfered with the fair competition by implementing this act. They experience favourism from the federal government in order to attain a competitive advantage over the foreign companies that may be trying to get into their local market. The government has made it clear to the companies that have managed to secure its tenders should ensure the usage of locally produced goods in their supplies. The local companies are given the first priority in the giving of tenders over the international tenders.

They government only makes use of the international products when they are not available locally, when the local prize is way higher than the international prize and also when they wish to fulfil the interest of the citizens. Without these exceptions, the international companies will stay at bay in their supply of tenders. This is beneficial to the American companies at a greater scale but also it is very well contradicting with the capitalism spirit which was set forth by the same government of the United States (MacCraw, 1999).

The American government thus contradicts itself with the Buy American Requirement in that what they practice does not go in line with the capitalism spirit that they endorsed (Scott, 2011). This is because capitalism advocates for freedom in the business market which is not in practiced here. Competition is denied in that the foreign companies that supply the foreign goods are not allowed to make their supplies to the US government. The local contractors that are awarded the contract are as well not allowed to supply the government with any foreign products. The local companies that have failed to secure the contract are as well not allowed to supply the companies that have the contract with any foreign good unless there the above three exceptions are applicable.

Connolly, 2008, says that a capitalistic market should let all the companies in a business market to compete according to their capabilities. This is thus not so because the American government has come forth with interventions in that they have introduced some regulations that enable the reduction in competition. These regulations have also contradicted a great deal capitalistic ethos.

Benefits of the Exception to the Buy American Requirements

This requirement comes with various exceptions. One of these is that if the local prize is expensive by 50% or more, the government should purchase the same product from the international market at a lower prize. The second exception is that if a requirements conflicts the interest of the public, then they will have to be imported. Thirdly, if a product is not available in the US market, they it will be supplied by an international company.

People might have different views with these exceptions but in my view, the exceptions listed above are of some benefit to the American economy. On the first exception, the government expenditure on supplies will be greatly reduced and thus the funds can be redirected to other projects within the country. The second exception protects the interests of the public. The government thus shows that as much as they would wish to protect the country’s economy, they would not do so at the expense of the citizens’ interest. Finally, the third exception shows clearly that the country is not mean and that once they lack something, they can as well import it. This ensures that they do not lack anything. In my view, all these exceptions are meant to strengthen the American Economy. This is because they are in line with the US economic goals.

Advantages of using the Buy American Requirements with the navigation system

            The Buy American Requirements has a myriad of benefits to the local companies producing local goods. VectorCal Company as well as my new company both produce the navigation system and thus stand at a higher chance of benefiting from the application of this requirement. This is because, these two companies can work jointly in producing better products and services at prices that are lower than those produced by other companies. This is because with the combined resources as well as expertise from the two companies, they are likely to have a higher competitive advantage over other companies producing the same goods (Manuel, 2013).

            Application of the Buy American Requirement will as well be beneficial to both the companies when a procurement process comes forth to assess the rate of taking care of the public interest with the local production of goods. This would make it easier for the two companies to win government tenders. The two companies will thus benefit from this.

Disadvantages of using the Buy American Requirements with the navigation system

            The move for the application of Buy American Requirements is very beneficial when applied on the navigation system but can as well bring forth more problems. First of all, both these companies are at a risk of not being favored over some local advantageous companies. This thus means that they may fail to benefit from this even after combining their resources and thus the application of this requirements will not be beneficial to their navigation system. The application of this requirement to each company individually is more likely to turn out and be beneficial other than when they are combined.

            Finally, the two navigation companies when combined will come up with one navigation system. The application of this requirement will thus mean that the company works as a single firm. This will thus reduce their chances to win the government tenders and thus it will turn out non-beneficial to both the companies.

Share with your friends
Order Unique Answer Now

Add a Comment

Get Up 50% Discount on Your First OrderUp To 50% Off Your First Order Due in Less Than 48 Hours

Grab this first time Discount, and save up to 50% on your first Order Due in Less Than 48 Hours.