Normally, a ban should not just be executed because majority supports it, but because it brings a new value to the society and conforms to the laws of the province or a country. Religious symbols are regarded to be important to the minorities who value their religious beliefs and values. They are also protected by freedom of speech and freedom of religion laws in Quebec (CTVNews 1). Such bans undermine such laws. However, when these symbols are likely to be used to undermine the rights of majority, then they should be banned to create a unified society where religion becomes personal affairs. Although it is hard to permit freedom of speech and limit religious rights, it is sometimes necessary when matters of security are in question. Majority support would imply that their use is subjecting majority of people into danger and the public chooses safety or benefits attained by foregoing their diverse religious values. Thus majority support should be an indication that the society is ready for the change and hence, the government should consider the change
Should a Government have the Right to Ban Religious Expression if the Majority of the Citizenry Supports it?
Annotated Bibliography Argumentative Essay Article Critique Australia Book Review Cancer Christianity Communication Constitution Contract Counseling Crime Criminal Justice Criminal Justice System Decision Making Democracy Diabetes Drugs Education Ethics Healthcare India Innovation Law Enforcement Leadership Marketing Music Nursing Obesity Patient Police Prison Qualitative Research Quantitative Research Reflection Research Paper Research Proposal Social Media Speech Supply Chain Technology Terrorism William Shakespeare Women Workforce
Need a Professional Writer to Work on Your Assignments? We will deliver Unique and Quality Work. Good Grade Guarantee!!