There are various ways of solving problems that touch on student behavior. One main process is the functional analysis of behavior, which relies on various approaches for purposes of identifying specific behavior. This identification assists the relevant teams from the education department in choosing appropriate interventions for solving such anomalies in behavior (Pierce & Cheney, 2008). Functional analysis of behavior entails exploration beyond behavior itself. This paper explores the similarities and difference between structural analysis and consequence analysis. Furthermore, it explores the steps involved in conducting the analysis. Finally it explores the strengths and weakness of functional behavior analysis.
Structural analysis is an approach involved in studying and analyzing various forms of social interactions (Pierce & Cheney, 2008). In fact, most researchers find it being the most appropriate methodology for analyzing personality disorders. On the other hand, consequence analysis entails reinforcement of the outcome of the event (Pierce & Cheney, 2008). It is a descriptive analysis, which a researcher conducts as a crucial part to complete the process of functional behavior assessment. The similarities, in this regard, are in the steps involved in both structural analysis and consequence analysis. First, the one requires paying attention and noting the occasions during which behavior happens. This is necessary for acknowledging and documenting the factors, which maintain the behavior. Secondly, there is need to establish the antecedents regarding the target behavior. The next step involves examination of functional assessment, and, lastly, evaluation of the outcome.
According to Pierce and Cheney (2008), the strengths of functional analysis include its exactitude regarding case conceptualization as well as direct connection to treatment implementation. In regards to the weaknesses, Pierce and Cheney (2008) points out that functional analysis of behavior lacks behavior. This means that there is a possibility of vagueness of functional analysis procedures and language impeding replication and communication.
In conclusion, functional analysis of behavior assists the relevant teams from the education department in choosing appropriate interventions for solving such anomalies in behavior. Structural analysis is an approach involved in studying and analyzing various forms of social interactions. Consequence analysis entails reinforcement of the outcome of the event.