Jury Racial Diversity
Racial and ethnic minority defendants are disgusted by the thought that an all-white jury would try them. However, in reality white police officers usually arrest them. An all-white jury then indicts them. All-white district attorneys prosecute them upon which an all-white jury convicts them in most instances. An all white state appellate court then denies then an appeal and white federal judges convict them. In so doing, the criminal proceedings exhibit impressions of racial inequality, which is prevalent in the criminal justice system. This makes race a critical emblem for racial and ethnic minorities. It helps in determining the fairness of the trial, legitimacy of the verdict and the integrity of the criminal justice system. This necessitates state legislature to ensure that there is representation of racial and ethnic minorities in juries (Daudistel et al., 1999).
According to marginalized segments of the community, it is wrong for an all-white jury to convict a black defendant or acquit a white defendant if the plaintiff is black. Having an all-white jury ‘racializes’ of the jury proceedings. This practice can be traced back to activities in the South after the Civil War. Ku Klux Klan committee various atrocities against blacks. They undertook massive lynching of blacks, which went unpunished by all-white juries. The white lynching mobs were never tried in courts in the South. This is despite the fact that the killer may have been known. In the contemporary American criminal justice system, minorities are rarely included in juries. Lack of participation of minorities makes it difficult for juries to provide a widely accepted verdict in trials that involve highly sensitive elements of racism (Liptak, 2007).
Various elements of federal law have led to the underrepresentation of racial minorities. The federal law requires courts to use registration of voters (ROV) list when selecting jurors. This is despite the fact that the list under-represents racial minorities. Certain courts use an additional list such as driver motor vehicle (DMV) records. However, this has not helped in solving the problem of underrepresentation since infrequent updates and technical difficulties when removing duplicate names in the records have led to underrepresentation of racial minorities. This is because white potential jurors are usually found in both the DMV and ROV records. Various computer scanning programs do not usually eliminate or merge duplicate names. This increases the chance of selecting an all-white jury. Various jury requirements, which include residency requirement and lack of a previous conviction, have also led to the elimination of poor and racial minorities (Diamond & Rose, 2005).
Download full paper on Jury Racial Diversity or order original paper on this topic or any other topic at an affordable price.
ORDER UNIQUE ANSWER NOW