System Integration Framework – Apache Camel, Mule ESB and Spring Integration

Introduction

            System integration framework is described as an outline process of bringing sub system components together and making sure that they function as single system. Different organization prefer different system integration framework based on their functionality and target framework. These system integration framework uses various software application depending with technicalities of that particular system (Domingues, 2000). However, integration system framework must be standardized such that they meet the globally recognized requirement and there are only three system integration framework that meet these standards. These are Apache Camel, Mule ESB and Spring Integration.

Apache Camel

            Apache Camel is very similar with Mule in terms of functionality. It provide people with many segments that are practical and applicable to any engineering. This is the only feature that makes Apache Camel unique and more significant than the Mule. In addition, Apache Camel allows for creation of own segment that fit the business operations without putting much efforts into it (Java.dzone.com, 2014). For organization that prefer the use of Spring Integration framework, Apache Camel also has Sprint Integration coordination. Also, provide XML DSL. This means that Apache Camel has additional components that are easy to use, thus easing the integration framework process.

            Apache Camel tend to make integration process more meaningful since it offer an extremely great visual fashioner referred to as Fuse IDE which is accessible through Fuse-source. The Fuse IDE is responsible for creating XML DSL code. Apache Camel also provide DSLs for Scala, Groovy and Java. As a result, network administrators does not need to compose much appalling XML. In fact it is easier and appealing to utilize DSLs instead of XML when carrying out reconciliation rationale.

Mule ESB

            As the name suggest, Mule ESB incorporate many extra provision that improves the integration framework as opposed to simple mixture of structures. Typically, Mule ESM is perceived as a lightweight integration framework which include XML DSL code which is utilized to integrate additional components into the system (Java.dzone.com, 2014). Unlike Spring Integration framework, Mule ESB only provides XML DSL. When Mule ESB and Spring Integration is compared, Mule ESB is simpler to read. Also, Mule ESB provide an exceptional and natural visual originator. The unique feature of the Mule ESB is the exceptional intriguing connectors that links to the critical restrictive interface such as Tibco Rendevous and SAP.

Spring Integration

            Spring Integration depends on well-known Spring Extend that make a customized model larger by upholding the combinations. Network administrator can make use of Spring features such as security, transaction, infusion or reliance in similar manner that other Spring activities are utilized (Java.dzone.com, 2014).  Analysis have indicated that Spring integration process work magnificently when there a recent Spring project that requires the combination of components. However, Spring Integration framework is perceived to be the most complex for project developers. Nonetheless, network administrator does not need to learn about Spring Integration framework if they understand the Spring itself.

Similarities

            All the three integration framework are generally easy to use and lightweight. When all factors and components are considered carefully, all the three integration framework can be utilized to integrate even the projects that are considered very complex (Java.dzone.com, 2014). Additionally, these three integration framework are compatible to different types of technologies. However, Apache Camel is considered as the best integration framework since it has the capability to support the DSLs for scala, groovy and Java.

Differences

Spring Integration framework is complex as compared to the two frameworks. On the hand Mule ESB is the easiest to read and build as compared to the two. Also, Spring Integration provide support to various technologies such as web services, HTTP, TCP and JMS. However, Apache Camel and Mule ESB provides additional components along the support to these other technologies (Java.dzone.com, 2014). For example, Mule ESB provide interesting connectors to interface such as Tibco Rendevous, Paypal and SAP, while Apache Camel provides DSL for Scala, Groovy and Java.

Share with your friends
Order Unique Answer Now