Strict Liability Standard

Strict liability standard refers to when the courts holds individuals or entities liable for damages or losses, without the need to prove elements of carelessness, mistakes, or negligence. On the other hand, a negligence standard refers to a case whereby individuals or entities are held liable by the courts for someone getting hurt or property being destroyed due to them acting carelessly or negligently (Katz & Sandroni, 2018). Therefore, strict liability standard is imposed in situations which courts feel that they was no negligence or carelessness, but the accused is deemed to have caused harm to other individuals or destruction of properties (Katz & Sandroni, 2018).

Read also Bob’s Strict Liability Case – BA 265

Thus, in strict liability cases, the complainant is only required to prove that a tort occurred and the accused was the one responsible either with or without intent or negligence.

Read also Business Tort Liability And The Pharmaceutical Industry

Example of a Strict Liability Standard

An example of a strict liability case was when a female worker sued Arrow Steel Inc. for strict liability. The worker was operating a baler machine manufactured by the company when it suddenly developed problems. As she attempted to repair the device, her right arm stuck in machine resulting in her suffering multiple injuries. Subsequently, she sued Arrow Steel Inc. for strict liability with claims the firm had manufactured a machine that was designed carelessly and sold without proper testing. On the other hand, the manufacturer termed the incident as unfortunate and that the complainant was partially to blame. On the day the trial, the jury found Arrow Steel Inc. unintentionally liable for the complainant’s injuries and had to pay her a settlement fee of $750,000 (“Real-Life Product Liability Cases: Are You Covered?”, n.d.).

Read also Negligence and Strict Liability – Ethical and Criminal Responsibility

In the above-highlighted example, imposing the standard is fair as the manufacturer’s faulty bale machine directly caused the worker’s injuries. As a general rule, strict liability standards are fair because in most cases the complainant seeks compensation from the defendant due to body injuries or harms as well as property damages caused by actions, products or services related to the defendant.

Share with your friends
Order Unique Answer Now

Add a Comment