The contemporary workplace environment is a complex and dynamic area of functioning guided by a strict code of conduct and basic standards developed over time to promote efficiency and productivity. From time to time, supervisors, front-line managers, and upper management are tasked with identifying novel organizational strategies likely to elevate the subjective experience of staff while also ensuring they meet set organizational objectives. Critical thinking is one such idea that has recently been championed by managers and organizational teams as one of the most relevant competences to possess in today’s fast-paced global business environment (Elder, 2022). The rationale behind the formal adoption of critical thinking skills within the modern-day workplace environment is that organizational staff should always be afforded a certain degree of autonomy within an individual occupational capacity.
Read also The Art of Critical thinking
Critical thinking often entails having the ability to isolate individual work-place scenarios requiring immediate attention, identifying a feasible solution to this problem, and being able to make the right decision when faced with an ethical dilemma. According to Hester (2021), organizations should always strive to foster and nurture critical thinking skills among their employees as one of the most reliable techniques when seeking to bolster both intellectual and organizational development. Developing an organizational culture centered on the application of critical thinking skills within the workplace environment is now hailed as a revolution in capacity building. The application of critical thinking skills, therefore, plays a major role in the subsequent creation of a workplace environment where staff are provided with an opportunity for career advancement through the streamlining of personal goals with organizational objectives.
Elements of Critical Thinking Required in the Workplace Environment
Growth and organizational progress is a methodical process known to rely heavily on shrewd leadership and the ability to identify the most beneficial policies to implement within the workplace environment. Critical think has often been described as a complex assemblage of logical perspective and positions designed to guide professionals in making informed decisions in a difficult situation. It typically encompasses the ability to make spontaneous rational decisions based on specified organizational culture and, therefore, serves as a crucial foundation for developing a practical plan of action. Management teams are usually at the forefront of establishing organizational standards to be observed by staff across each organizational level to promote uniformity. This particular aptitude is normally developed through rigorous training through refresher courses based on capacity building and the eventually creation of a logical reference point for application. Management teams are, thus, obligated to ensure that participants gain a rich understanding of all basic elements of critical thinking as a crucial starting point during such endeavors.
Moreover, this process also includes acknowledging some of the main barriers to efficiency and realization of critical thinking within the workplace environment to ensure staff are equipped with solutions to such problems in the foreseeable future. Resistance to change and work-related stress have often been cited as some of the most common barriers to critical thinking among staff operating within high-pressure business environments. Countering these two elements through employee education and the proper identification of possible contingency measures may be the difference between success and failure in an organization. Employees who happen to experience a high level of work-related stress are often associated with the irrational decision-making skills and an overall inability to satisfy key performance indicator (KPIs). They are prone to agitation and emotional outbursts out of sheer frustration and the inability to satisfy basic organizational requirements. Management teams are, therefore, required to be particularly mindful of the basic dissemination of elements of critical thinking to staff to avoid unwarranted confrontations with staff while promoting collective consensus in the workplace environment.
Relevance of Reason, Emotion, and Community in Critical Thinking
At the present moment, reason, emotion, and communication play a fundamental role as the basic tenets of critical thinking within the context of the workplace environment. Management teams, front-line managers, and supervisors often expect staff to exercise an elite level of critical appraisal during different scenarios with the expectation that they are fully capable of exercising reason during high-pressure scenarios. The capacity to reason sets employees apart from any possible rivals and is typically encouraged as one of the ways of ensuring a company always has a competitive advantage over contemporaries operating in a similar sector (Dirkx, 2017). The ability to reason widens the basic scope of possibilities for an organization given that individuals with this aptitude are able to evaluate the benefits and implications of organizational decisions based on existing facts and operational standards. Any inadequacies in the system, such as a potentially faulty warranty policy, are painstakingly evaluated based solely on established facts and empirical evidence gathered over an extended period of time.
Read also Critical Thinking – Is Abortion Wrong?
The integration of evidence-based strategies frequently creates scenarios where any potential technical inadequacy is subjected to a thorough practical evaluation to establish possible malfunctions and the subsequent identification of feasible solutions. Besides, reason is also bolstered by an individual’s emotional intelligence and their ability to apply within the archetypal critical thinking scenario. It involves taking into account the ideas and perspectives of other team members and debating them respectfully to arrive at a consensus. Emotional intelligence also entails being acutely aware of individual’s mental state at any given to promote a sense of congruence while preventing the overlap of ideas. The ultimate inclusion of communication as a crucial element of critical thinking also ensures that any emerging conflict is solved through dialogue based on existing interpersonal relationships. This often entails avoiding aggressive posturing during communication as one of the most practical solutions when seeking to avoid direct confrontations known to foment resentment and conflict within a team.
Fallacies and Argument in Critical Thinking
The modern-day workplace environment is frequently plagued prejudgments and wrongful assumptions made by employees based on subjective experiences. Team members who happen to acknowledge the actual influence of fallacies and arguments within the context of critical thinking stand a better chance of making remarkable contributions to the organization due to this type of elite reevaluation. Today, ad hominem fallacies feature prominently within the contemporary workplace environment and are said to have a major impact on the arguments voiced by team members and decisions made during a particularly taxing situation. Although team members may voice their claims and conclusions based solely on available evidence, their argument may end up being rejected based solely on warped assumptions made by others within this operational framework. Dismissed arguments should, therefore, be subjected to re-evaluations, by other members of the management team to determine whether they were warranted or employed as a personal attack.
Critical thinking is, perhaps, one of the most highly acclaimed aptitudes in the modern-day workplace environment. It is specifically designed to ensure team members are able to make practical decisions in the face of challenging circumstances and are eventually able to bolster the decision-making process with fact-based assumption. Full acknowledgment of the influence of the basic elements of critical thinking in the decision-making process is also necessary to attempting to promote practicality at work. The role of resistance, work-related stress, reason, emotion, and communication should also be routinely evaluated by a relevant management team. This opens the door to discussions on the potential effects of fallacies and arguments during the decision-making process and the influence of able leadership in resolving any such problem.